India’s captain Suryakumar Yadav and opener Shubman Gill, Dubai Worldwide Cricket Stadium, Dubai, United Arab Emirates, September 10, 2025. — ReutersIndian captain accused of politicising cricket after win.Neutrality breach beneath ICC code reviewed.ICC mulls disciplinary motion over feedback.
India captain Suryakumar Yadav has landed in deep trouble after the Worldwide Cricket Council (ICC) accepted a grievance filed by the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) and ordered a evaluation of his post-match feedback made after India’s Asia Cup group-stage win towards Pakistan on September 14, Indian media reported.
PCB’s letter to ICC
The ICC has stated it’s analyzing the PCB’s grievance, which accuses Suryakumar of politicising cricket and breaching the code of conduct regarding neutrality. A proper listening to could also be convened, with Yadav given the choice to simply accept the cost or face proceedings earlier than the ICC match referee, alongside representatives of the BCCI and PCB.
Sources stated the PCB submitted an in depth letter to the ICC, demanding strict motion towards Suryakumar. The letter alleged that the Indian captain had “involved the game in politics and damaged its reputation.”
It maintained that every one clauses of the ICC’s code of conduct utilized to the September 14 match and that Yadav had intentionally referenced the Pahalgam incident and Operation Sindoor.
In line with the letter, Suryakumar’s conduct went towards the spirit of the code of conduct and warranted motion. It recalled that the ICC had already declared slogans comparable to “Free Gaza” and “Freedom is Human Right” to be violations of the code of conduct.
The PCB additional warned that if motion was not taken, “the cricket field would risk becoming a political arena,” and concluded that the Indian captain’s statements had been straight towards Pakistan, requiring the strictest potential measures.
The evaluation comes towards the backdrop of an ongoing row between the arch-rivals, stemming from the group-stage conflict, which attracted appreciable consideration each on and off the sphere.
The drama started when the Indian captain crossed all boundaries of sportsmanship through the use of his post-match presentation speech to tug politics into cricket, a transfer described by many observers as “unprecedented” and “damaging for the spirit of the game”.
Compounding the stress was India’s refusal to alternate a standard handshake on the toss ceremony — an omission reportedly directed by match referee Andy Pycroft.
Issues escalated to the purpose the place the Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) thought-about pulling out of the Asia Cup altogether. The state of affairs was defused solely after Pycroft admitted to mishandling elements of the controversy and expressed remorse, in line with PCB.
BCCI recordsdata grievance towards Haris and Farhan
Including to the row, Indian media reported that the BCCI has additionally lodged a grievance with the ICC towards Pakistani gamers Haris Rauf and Sahibzada Farhan for alleged provocative gestures throughout the identical event. Video proof has reportedly been submitted to match referee Andy Pycroft.
The Indian board alleged that Haris Rauf made jet crash gestures and signalled “six–zero” in response to spectators chanting “Kohli, Kohli”, whereas Sahibzada Farhan marked his half-century with a gunfire celebration. The BCCI claimed such actions had been towards the spirit of the sport and demanded strict disciplinary motion.
India gained the September 14 group match by seven wickets in Dubai and afterwards refused to shake arms with their opponents, angering Pakistan. It was the primary assembly between the neighbours since a four-day armed battle in Could left greater than 70 individuals useless.
“Perfect occasion, taking the time out, we stand by the families of the victims of the Pahalgam terror attack. We express our solidarity… Want to dedicate the win to all our armed forces who showed a lot of bravery,” he stated in the course of the presentation ceremony.
On the post-match press convention, Yadav went additional, saying the Indian crew averted handshakes with Pakistani gamers on the directions of the BCCI and the Indian authorities. “Our government and BCCI, we were aligned today… We came here to just play the game,” he remarked.
The PCB stated these statements crossed the road, alleging that Suryakumar used the match as a platform for political messaging.
With the ICC now admitting the PCB’s grievance, Suryakumar faces potential disciplinary motion if the listening to proceeds. A remaining choice is anticipated quickly.
