Discovering the proper cybersecurity SaaS answer could be tough contemplating the quite a few components that should be thought-about, such because the trade your group operates in, the variety of distributors your group manages, the funds accessible to discover a appropriate safety answer, and the precise use instances to your group.
A part of the choice course of is to trial many alternative merchandise so you possibly can evaluate a number of providers and discover one of the best answer to your group’s wants. In the end, it comes right down to how your group decides to make the most of the software program, which implies understanding all of the doable alternate options in the identical VRM/ASM house.
Study extra about Cybersecurity’s vendor threat administration product >
Vanta Choices & Options
Vanta is a startup based mostly in San Francisco, CA, specializing in safety monitoring, cybersecurity threat evaluation, and compliance administration providers. Vanta helps organizations obtain compliance with auditing requirements and safety frameworks by means of automated processes of their safety compliance software program.
Vanta’s foremost choices are:
Serving to companies set up and reveal compliance with safety rules and frameworks, resembling SOC 2, HIPAA, GDPR, ISO 27001, and USDPVendor threat administration utilizing acquired third-party service, TrustPage, to make sure third events are additionally assembly compliance requirementsAutomated questionnaire, documentation, and safety overview managementVanta Belief Studies demonstrating present safety postures and safety compliance progress to potential and current prospects and vendorsTop 10 Vanta Alternate options
We’ll give attention to the highest Vanta opponents so to discover one of the best various that matches your group’s wants.
1. Cybersecurity
Cybersecurity is a frontrunner in third-party threat and assault floor administration and helps a whole bunch of worldwide organizations forestall information breaches, monitor third-party distributors, enhance their safety postures, and handle 1st and Third-party compliance. They provide two foremost merchandise: Cybersecurity BreachSight and Cybersecurity Vendor Danger as their assault floor and vendor threat administration providers.
ProsComprehensive, end-to-end threat administration workflowsManaged providers for vendor assessmentsProvides threat scoring for a company’s full threat posture (not simply particular person dangers)Can generate government summaries and studies by means of the platform to help in government decision-making processesInstant safety scores for 1st and Third-parties to watch cybersecurity posturesEasy-to-use, intuitive dashboards throughout the platformReal-time updates and notifications for threat exposures5000+ app integrationsConsNo automation for the safety certification processSmaller shared evaluation libraryPricingUpGuard vs. Vanta
Cybersecurity and Vanta have comparable use instances for safety compliance and Vendor Danger Administration (VRM). Nonetheless, the primary distinction is that Cybersecurity is extra closely centered on offering visibility and documentation of the chance postures of third-party distributors that can be utilized to make government selections. This entails a mix of on the spot safety scores, information leak detection, exterior assault floor scanning, and steady monitoring of internet-facing belongings towards 70+ assault vectors that may in the end be used to find out vendor compliance.
Cybersecurity additionally gives managed providers for companies ought to they really feel the necessity to offload the seller evaluation and questionnaire completion course of, which Vanta doesn’t at present present.
However, Vanta supplies a extra established course of designed to assist companies and their distributors scale back the time and labor wanted to achieve sure safety certifications or meet sure compliance rules. Vanta’s TPRM program can be powered by its most up-to-date third-party acquisition of Trustpage, which makes use of a shared evaluation library strategy to automate safety assessments and opinions.
Nonetheless, one downside of Vanta is that it doesn’t present as a lot threat visibility into third-party distributors or provide any exterior scanning and monitoring capabilities to stop potential information breaches or leaks proactively. Companies on the lookout for a extra complete cybersecurity answer could wish to think about trying past Vanta to handle their safety applications.
For extra data, try our in-depth, side-by-side comparability web page: https://www.upguard.com/evaluate/vanta-vs-upguard.
2. Drata
Drata is a San Diego, CA-based safety and compliance automation platform that screens an organization’s safety controls to streamline its compliance workflows and guarantee audit readiness.
Drata UI – Supply: drata.comProsSimple, easy-to-use, intuitive interfaceStrong buyer supportComprehensive coverage builderBeginner-friendlyConsLack of integration optionsNo asset discoveryPricingPublic pricing data is just not accessible. Many options are bought as add-ons, which might add to the ultimate value.Vanta vs. Drata
Because of the main use instances in compliance and safety certification automation, Drata is extra of a direct competitor to Vanta than Cybersecurity. Drata at present streamlines 14 pre-built compliance frameworks of their automated course of with choices to create customized frameworks. Comparatively, Vanta maintains 21 pre-built safety and privateness frameworks and likewise has customized controls to construct customized frameworks.
Nonetheless, based on opinions, Drata appears to have a stronger buyer help division and extra constant characteristic updates than Vanta. Some prospects have additionally famous that Drata has restricted integration functionality, which is in growth.
3. Scrut Automation
Scrut Automation is an automatic compliance platform that helps companies adjust to varied regulatory frameworks and auditing requirements. Scrut helps maintain monitor of all the safety controls of an organization and likewise screens enterprise purposes, information, and cloud environments for fast dangers.
ProsExperienced technical teamEasy-to-use platformExcellent buyer success teamConsFeatures are nonetheless developingPricing
Public pricing data is just not accessible. Nonetheless, compliance automation packages have been famous to be decrease than Drata and Vanta.
Vanta vs. Scrut Automation
Scrut Automation remains to be a comparatively new firm, being based in 2021. Though they’ve made huge strides to compete straight with different leaders within the Compliance Automation and Safety Compliance classes, many options or processes nonetheless require refinement. Nonetheless, Scrut combats this with a incredible buyer help crew and an inside safety crew that may additionally present steering.
Each Vanta and Scrut handle vendor dangers by means of threat assessments and questionnaires. It’s necessary to notice that recognized dangers for each platforms are mapped towards compliance requirements, however solely Scrut supplies steady 24/7 threat monitoring. In distinction, Vanta gives an automatic safety questionnaire course of for quicker safety opinions, whereas Scrut makes use of prebuilt questionnaires that distributors have to answer in a web-based portal.
4. OneTrust Vendorpedia
OneTrust is a US-based firm with main working workplaces in Atlanta and London. The OneTrust Vendorpedia platform helps customers assess and handle cyber threat from third-party distributors of their digital provide chain and covers many world regulatory and compliance frameworks. OneTrust Vendorpedia additionally leverages safety questionnaires and remediation workflows by means of change and ad-hoc fashions to assist prospects scale back threat and enhance due diligence effectivity throughout vendor relationships.
OneTrust Vendorpedia UI – Supply: onetrust.com
ProsOffers pre-built questionnaires in an automatic processEasy to combine with different platformsSimple, easy-to-use interfaceCovers world regulatory complianceConsToo many options with an extra value for guided implementationNo exterior safety monitoring availableNo information leak detection or monitoringNo vendor threat remediation workflowsPoor buyer serviceLimited reporting functionalityPricingOffers largely clear pricing for his or her a number of choices through their web site, with versatile pricing & billing choices for small & rising companies.Vanta vs. OneTrust Vendorpedia
One in all OneTrust’s foremost promoting factors is an in depth library of worldwide compliance frameworks that organizations can map their dangers towards. Which means that OneTrust can have a deeper presence in lots of markets resembling EMEA, which has strict cyber rules. Nonetheless, solely Vanta has compliance and safety certification automation. It’s necessary to notice that companies can create customized frameworks by means of Vanta’s platform to map their dangers.
Each Vanta and OneTrust would not have steady safety monitoring, nor do they supply safety score providers. Nonetheless, like Vanta, OneTrust leans closely into the compliance, regulatory, and auditing requirements house and fewer so on the info safety facet. One distinction is that OneTrust Vendorpedia has the flexibility to evaluate the third-party threat of distributors however doesn’t have a longtime vendor threat administration course of that Vanta can present.
5. SecurityScorecard
SecurityScorecard is a New York-based safety scores platform that makes use of visitors and different publicly accessible information to construct safety scores to judge distributors and handle cyber threat. SecurityScoreCard additionally screens “hacker chatter” and different public information feeds for indicators of compromise.
SecurityScorecard UI – Supply: securityscorecard.com
ProsSimple-to-use, intuitive interfaceCustomizable dashboard optionsDetailed safety ratingsEasily accessible reportsFree account accessConsistent new characteristic releaseConsExpensive pricing modelToo many false positives (for information leaks)ATLAS (threat assessments and questionnaires) doesn’t combine with the SSC platformSlow safety scanning and threat visibility updates (as much as one week)Safety scores can take 90+ days to updateUse third-party service to conduct information leak monitoringOutsourced third-party threat administration providers (TPRMS)PricingPublic pricing data is just not accessible. Studies say pricing begins at $16,500 for self-assessment plus 5 distributors, and extra distributors value $1,500-$2,000 per vendor per 12 months.Vanta vs. SecurityScorecard
Whereas SecurityScorecard is primarily a safety score and vendor threat administration service (together with questionnaires), a part of their product additionally helps organizations and their distributors handle compliance and guarantee compliance with varied frameworks. Nonetheless, the seller compliance characteristic can solely be accessed as a part of SecurityScorecard’s Enterprise and Enterprise plans.
SecurityScorecard has extra features in abstract studies, threat monitoring, cyber threat quantification, and automatic alerts about any safety rating adjustments that Vanta doesn’t provide at present. It’s necessary to notice that SSC doesn’t handle their TPRM in-house and outsources the work to ATLAS, which doesn’t combine with the SSC administration platform.
Potential prospects could select Vanta for his or her automated safety certification course of in the event that they solely wish to attain particular certifications. Nonetheless, companies trying to develop their TPRM applications whereas gaining visibility into distributors’ safety performances and threat quantification could wish to think about SecurityScorecard.
Nonetheless, as a result of SecurityScorecard is well-known throughout the safety scores and evaluation house, its providers are additionally one of the crucial costly choices in the marketplace and is probably not best for SMEs or companies simply trying to get certifications or meet audit requirements. Moreover, SecurityScorecard has been met with poor opinions on their customer support, poor information leak detection triggering too many false positives, and inaccurate information.
6. Secureframe
Secureframe is a San Francisco-based firm that was based in 2020, working primarily within the compliance and safety automation house.
Secureframe UI – Supply: secureframe.com
ProsGood buyer supportClear checklists for compliance completionGood integrationsConsUnintuitive, complicated consumer interface that’s arduous to navigateIncomplete options that also want developmentBuggy platformPoor onboarding processPoor TPRM servicesPricing
Public pricing data is just not accessible. Nonetheless, consumer opinions point out that Secureframe pricing is greater than Vanta.
Vanta vs. Secureframe
Secureframe is just like Vanta as a result of each platforms present safety certification automation providers for frameworks like CCPA or PCI DSS. One in all Secureframe’s greatest options is that it totally lays out every step required to adjust to a framework or regulation. Moreover, Secureframe gives seamless app integrations with many widespread providers that make it simple to make use of.
Nonetheless, Secureframe usually runs into bugs within the platform and has an unintuitive UI that’s poorly defined through the onboarding course of or in-platform. Secureframe appears to be a product that also requires numerous growth and refining to grow to be a extra full compliance automation answer, whereas Vanta has a extra in depth pre-built framework library and a much less buggy platform.
Though Secureframe does provide third-party threat administration (TPRM) providers, it isn’t a promoting level for the platform and is famous as certainly one of its weaker options.
7. AuditBoard
AuditBoard is a cloud-based platform specializing in audit, threat, and compliance administration that’s generally utilized by skilled auditors. AuditBoard can be a fully-integrated GRC platform that gives vendor threat administration options.
AuditBoard UI – Supply: auditboard.com
ProsVery responsive buyer supportGreat for all auditing standardsEasy implementationConsLack of integrationsLimited or missing functionalitySteep studying curvePricing
Public pricing data is just not accessible.
Vanta vs. AuditBoard
The principle distinction between Vanta and AuditBoard is that AuditBoard doesn’t have an automatic course of for attaining safety certifications. AuditBoard additionally supplies vendor threat administration by means of threat assessments and ongoing monitoring. Extra importantly, AuditBoard is cloud-based, giving companies extra room to scale their compliance applications.
AuditBoard additionally has merchandise for inside auditing, TPRM, and an ESG (environmental, social, and company governance) strategy for companies. An ESG strategy permits firms to view their dangers in an environmental and social context and handle these dangers as a part of an total development technique.
Whereas AuditBoard has a extra complete product set, Vanta’s automation for safety compliance certifications could also be all a company wants. Nonetheless, AuditBoard does make the most of a streamlined workflow to realize compliance.
8. Responsive (previously RFPIO)
Responsive is a response administration software program that goals to assist prospects set up vendor responses for quicker compliance, proof gathering, and threat assessments, together with managing RFPs, RFIs, RFXs, safety questionnaires, and due diligence questionnaires.
Responsive UI – Supply: responsive.io
ProsEasy-to-use, organized platformSeamless workflowCan handle a number of tasks simultaneouslyCustomizable dashboards for higher visibility ConsNew customers could get confused within the content material librarySteep studying curve for some featuresUsers could encounter some bugs and system glitchesLack of integrationsPricing
Public pricing data is just not accessible.
Vanta vs. Responsive
Responsive has a really robust content material library and data base to assist companies take management of their venture administration and documentation. In doing so, companies can affirm compliance a lot quicker utilizing Responsive’s content material and response administration platform.
Vanta has an analogous characteristic in utilizing a shared evaluation library to ship vendor safety opinions and set up 1st and Third-party compliance states. Vanta is closely depending on collaboration but additionally has a robust data base for step-by-step compliance achievement.
Vanta’s foremost promoting level is its automated course of to achieve safety certifications way more rapidly and minimize down a usually months-long course of to just some weeks. Though Responsive makes use of its personal streamlined safety questionnaire course of, they don’t provide a threat administration product or present threat visibility into its distributors. They’re primarily proposal and doc administration software program to enhance response instances and accuracy.
